Thursday, May 5, 2011

Lets Argue.

Old
TOL Subscriber



Reputation:
Letsargue is making a name for themselvesLetsargue is making a name for themselvesLetsargue is making a name for themselvesLetsargue is making a name for themselvesLetsargue is making a name for themselvesLetsargue is making a name for themselvesLetsargue is making a name for themselvesLetsargue is making a name for themselves
Add to Letsargue's Reputation Report Post
November 7th, 2010, 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lassie1865 View Post
Before we can intelligently discuss what various the NT books say, it is necessary to understand the current state of ancient manuscripts. Anyone read Bruce Metzger, Philip Comfort, David Barrat, and Brad Erhman? Our current English translations are not presently substantially based upon the oldest manuscripts, despite their claims to the contrary. Now that we have the Dead Sea Scrolls, we can study those for the best understanding of the Tanakh. Also, many of Paul's epistles are written by someone other than Paul at a much later date. 2 Peter seems to have been written by someone other than Peter at a much later date also; therefore one cannot say that "Peter approved of Paul's writings as 'Scripture'." There is an English translation being made right now in England by Stephen Walch based upon the oldest extant manuscripts; you can read it at: thewaytoyahuwah
There is a word-for-word analysis of the Greek of Galatians called: questioningpaul by Craig Winn. What did Yahushua say was properly the Word of Yahuwah? Yahushua said: "If you want to understand Me, scrutinize the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms." Of whom did Yahushua warn Peter who would arrive as a "wolf in sheep's clothing" and lead Peter "to a place/position he would not want to go?" Another suggestion: study the Scriptures from the beginning, from Genesis forward; then you will be able to evaluate the NT with greater perspective.


There is nothing in the Scriptures that say anything like that. The Scriptures of God say what they say. – You can believe anything some Scholar or Phd. writes in a book, and they all write something different. It just depends on what false church supports it. The Catholics don’t support what the Scholars of the Baptist church support, or the churches of Christ. God is not divided within itself; all division is from without the Scriptures. – Sorry! – I’ll take what GOD says in the Scriptures. – If the Scriptures are in error, then there cannot be anyone saved through those errors. – So believe what you want to believe that is not found in the Scriptures as is.

Paul – 110710






---Gal. 4:16.
---"Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth"???
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
(#4722) Old
Trainee



Reputation:
JesusLovesuKnight is an unknown quantity at this point
Add to JesusLovesuKnight's Reputation Report Post
Today, 10:36 PM
Lets Argue might be a Sleeper Joey Account?





Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
(#4723) Old
Trainee



Reputation:
JesusLovesuKnight is an unknown quantity at this point
Add to JesusLovesuKnight's Reputation Report Post
Today, 10:37 PM
Lets Argue could be a Sleeper Joey Account, right? You never know. That sounds Town Heretical to me, if I don't say so myself.





Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
(#4724) Unread
Trainee



Reputation:
JesusLovesuKnight is an unknown quantity at this point
Add to JesusLovesuKnight's Reputation Report Post
Today, 10:48 PM
Jesus is like effin Oatmeal Joey Arnold, because you can't kill Him or ban Him, ever. Jesus is God. Jesus is not effin dirt or oatmeal like Joey Arnold is. We might all just be Sleeper Joey Arnold Accounts. Just ask Mr. Religions Dad. Sounds Heretical, but Jesus still Loves Knight.




No comments:

Post a Comment